About KlydeLabs

The CEO is a dog.
The standards aren't.

KlydeLabs is a two-person company, if you're generous about what counts as a person. We build the clipping tool we wanted and couldn't buy: one that cuts your whole video into sections and lets you decide what ships — instead of handing back three guesses and calling it a day.

Est. 2026
/
Section-based AI clipping
/
1 human
/
1 dog

Clyde, a small cream-coloured dog, wearing a yellow bucket hat — Cut here: the hat lands, and the next line opens clean.

01:12The core argument

Why we build this

Point a normal AI clipper at a sixty-minute episode and it hands back three clips with a virality score attached. The other fifty-seven minutes — material you already paid to produce — doesn't come back.

It wasn't deleted. It was ranked, and left near the bottom of a list nobody scrolls. Which sounds harmless until you notice what loses that ranking by construction: the careful answer to the hard question. It has no hook. It doesn't spike. It opens by restating the question. It is also, very often, the best thing you said all episode.

Your best part wasn't dropped. It was ranked.

So we built the opposite. KlydeLabs reads the whole video, finds where the subject actually changes, and cuts along those boundaries — cold open, the core argument, the Q&A, the sponsor read, the wrap-up. Full coverage, in order, nothing thrown away. One ready-to-post clip per section. Then it stops and waits, because nothing renders until you say so.

Every cut tells you why it's there. Nudge a boundary, keep six, skip one. Over time it learns how you cut — your lengths, the intros you always drop, which direction you nudge — rather than how the internet cuts.

The machine does the watching. The human keeps the judgement. That division of labour is the entire product, and it's why the tool asks for a click before it spends a single second of GPU on your behalf.

We also try not to lie to you in small ways. The progress bar shows real progress. When a job fails, it tells you what failed instead of inventing a success. And we deleted our own “30 spots left” scarcity counter the week we noticed it had never once counted down.

04:05The team

Namesake

Clyde

Chief Executive Officer

Clyde came first. The company is named after him, give or take a letter, and he has never once acknowledged this.

He leads the way all great executives do: horizontally, from another room, four hours into a nap. Documented contributions include sitting on the laptop mid-deploy, reviewing pull requests by walking across them, and enforcing an 11-to-4 quiet block that quietly became company policy.

He holds firm positions on the doorbell, the vacuum, and one specific squirrel. He wears the hat because he likes the hat. He does not do email, standups, or feedback rounds. Revenue is up.

His one contribution to the product is the name, which he supplied passively, by existing. He was compensated in treats. He has never asked for equity and would not know what to do with it.

Reports to: no one
Meetings attended: 0
Lines of code: 0
Longest focus block: 6h 12m (nap)
Preferred KPI: treats / hour

Everything else Illustrated portrait of Sharon S

Sharon S

Worker

Sharon does everything that isn't napping.

She's the one who notices — the practical details and the emotional ones. The loose end nobody wrote down. The sentence that reads a little passive-aggressive. The half-second a clip should have held before it cut. She'll rewrite a two-line message four times, not to polish it, but to make sure it still sounds like a person.

Her range is the useful kind: coordination, communication, design, branding, and enough technical fluency to be dangerous in the good way. She thinks in five-year arcs and also in road trips, beaches, music, food, and this dog.

Here's the part that ended up in the product: she is never satisfied with something being merely technically correct. It has to be right for the situation, right for the person, and right for her. A clip that is technically a highlight and actually wrong is, to Sharon, a bug. That standard is more or less the roadmap.

Reports to: Clyde
Currently perfecting: a cartoon of the CEO
Acceptable distraction: is it thocky enough
Rewrites per message: 4
Non-negotiable: sounds like a person

Org chart · complete

ClydeChief Executive Officer

treats

SharonWorker

Solid line: authority. Dotted line: the actual mechanism.

07:18What we hold to

Full coverage beats a good guess.

Your whole video gets sectioned and cut, not scanned for spikes. Three clips out of sixty minutes isn't a shortlist — it's fifty-seven minutes you paid for and never saw again.

Every cut explains itself.

If we chose a boundary, you get the reason in plain language and a control to overrule it. No confidence score floating on its own with nothing behind it.

Say the true thing.

Honest progress bars, honest failures, honest pricing in hours instead of credits. If a number on our site can't survive being checked, it doesn't go on our site.

09:44Wrap-up

Bring one episode.
We'll cut all of it.

Paste a link or upload a file. You'll see every section your video actually has, with a reason on every cut, before anything renders.

Try it on one episode

60 free minutes a month · No credit card · No credits, ever

The CEO is a dog.The standards aren't.